The momentum for civil asset forfeiture reform continued Tuesday. The Florida House of Representatives unanimously passed SB 1044 less than a week after it passed the state Senate without opposition. SB 1044 requires law enforcement to make an arrest before property believed to be connected to a crime is seized and requires the government to present proof beyond a reasonable doubt before property can be forfeited to the state.
In most states, law enforcement does not need to arrest, formally charge, or even convict some before taking permanent possession of their property. Some states, though, have established a criminal conviction as a prerequisite to forfeiture. Those states include New Mexico and Montana, both of which, just last year, passed this essential property rights protection for innocent owners. While a criminal conviction would not be required in Florida under SB 1044, the evidentiary standard it sets — “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” — is the same the government needs to secure a conviction.
SB 1044, introduced by state Sen. Jeff Brandes (R-St. Petersburg), would also require the seizing agency to pay a filing fee of at least $1,000 to begin forfeiture proceedings and post a $1,500 bond that would be payable to the property owner if law enforcement fails to the evidentiary standard necessary to keep the seized property. Unlike other states where law enforcement has fought forfeiture reform, the Florida Sheriff’s Association and the Florida Association of Police Chiefs worked with Brandes on compromise language and backed SB 1044 as…